Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40748920›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2025

Community-based solutions for chronic disease management during natural disasters: A systematic review.

Aditi Iyer, Arthur Bookstein, Giselle Kim, Justine Po

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Aditi IyerDepartment of Neuroscience, Duke University Trinity College of Arts & Sciences, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9115-0738
Arthur BooksteinKeck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8218-0401
Giselle KimKeck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1222-4430
Justine PoKeck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5399-2208

Funding

Translation CoreP2CES033433 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Jill E Johnston · 2022 to 2026
$4.9M
NIEHS NIH HHS P2C ES033433
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite rapid increases in both the burden of chronic disease and climate change-driven extreme weather events globally, the need to jointly address these crises remains largely overlooked. Chronic diseases require ongoing and often specialized care, which natural disasters disrupt by increasing physiological stressors and disrupting access to healthcare facilities, food, shelter and medications. Community-based solutions can mitigate these health risks, especially in low-resource settings and among historically underserved populations. This systematic review aimed to identify key recommendations for community-based interventions that aid with chronic disease management during extreme weather events. A comprehensive search strategy was used to yield 46 eligible studies from 266 search results from Embase, PubMed and Google Scholar. Articles were included if they discussed chronic diseases, community-based solutions and natural disasters and excluded if they were not English-language and/or not published in a peer-reviewed journal. Articles were assessed and selected using PRISMA guidelines, and their quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tools. The final sample of studies represented 19 countries and consisted of four quantitative, 35 qualitative and seven mixed-method studies. Minimal quantitative data was a key limitation of this review and topic, which requires further research. From the selected studies, a narrative synthesis approach was used to derive nine themes of solutions. Findings reflected the highest number of interventions and recommendations targeting patient education, continuity of medication management, stakeholder collaboration and digital health.

Identifiers

PMID40748920
PMCPMC12316207

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.