Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40748964›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

A comparative study of machine learning models for automated detection and classification of retinal diseases in Ghana.

Gifty Duah, Eric Nyarko, Anani Lotsi

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gifty DuahDepartment of Statistics and Actuarial Science, School of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, University of Ghana, Legon, Accra, Ghana.
Eric NyarkoDepartment of Statistics and Actuarial Science, School of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, University of Ghana, Legon, Accra, Ghana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1666-7489
Anani LotsiDepartment of Statistics and Actuarial Science, School of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, University of Ghana, Legon, Accra, Ghana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7776-6501

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRetinal diseases, a significant global health concern, often lead to severe vision impairment and blindness, resulting in substantial functional and social limitations. This study explored a novel goal of developing and comparing the performance of multiple state-of-the-art convolutional neural network (CNN) models for the automated detection and classification of retinal diseases using optical coherence tomography (OCT) images.

methodThe study utilized several models, including DenseNet121, ResNet50, Inception V3, MobileNet, and OCT images obtained from the WATBORG Eye Clinic, to detect and classify multiple retinal diseases such as glaucoma, macular edema, posterior vitreous detachment (PVD), and normal eye cases. The preprocessing techniques employed included data augmentation, resizing, and one-hot encoding. We also used the Gaussian Process-based Bayesian Optimization (GPBBO) approach to fine-tune the hyperparameters. Model performance was evaluated using the F1-Score, precision, recall, and area under the curve (AUC).

resultAll the CNN models evaluated in this study demonstrated a strong capability to detect and classify various retinal diseases with high accuracy. MobileNet achieved the highest accuracy at 96% and AUC of 0.975, closely followed by DenseNet121, which had 95% accuracy and an AUC of 0.963. Inception V3 and ResNet50, while not as high in accuracy, showed potential in specific contexts, with 83% and 79% accuracy, respectively.

conclusionThese results underscore the potential of advanced CNN models for diagnosing retinal diseases. With the exception of ResNet50, the other CNN models displayed accuracy levels that are comparable to other state-of-the-art deep learning models. Notably, MobileNet and DenseNet121 showed considerable promise for use in clinical settings, enabling healthcare practitioners to make rapid and accurate diagnoses of retinal diseases. Future research should focus on expanding datasets, integrating multi-modal data, exploring hybrid models, and validating these models in clinical environments to further enhance their performance and real-world applicability.

Indexed as

Machine LearningRetinal DiseasesBayes TheoremGhanaHumansNeural Networks, ComputerRetinaTomography, Optical Coherence

Identifiers

PMID40748964
PMCPMC12316318

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.