ReviewNature protocols2025
Comparative genomics approach to infer ancestral cell karyotypes and reconstruct the evolutionary trajectories of plant chromosomes.
Review in Nature protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chromosomes are key structural and functional components of heredity. Reconstruction of ancestral cell karyotypes (ACKs) and evolutionary trajectories of chromosomes (CETs) can reveal how structural and functional changes in chromosomes have occurred during evolution. The whole-genome duplication integrated analysis toolkit implements a telomere-centric model on the basis of the comparative analysis of gene collinearity within and between plant genomes to reconstruct the ACKs and CETs of many angiosperm plants whose genomes have been complicated by repeated polyploidization and subsequent repatterning. Here we summarize the steps for using whole-genome duplication integrated analysis to infer the gene collinearity within a genome or between genomes and to infer the repeated polyploidization specific to a plant or common to multiple plants or plant families. In addition, we provide an example with three grass genomes. We also describe procedures to infer ancestral chromosomes at key evolutionary nodes, to reconstruct CETs from the deep past to extant plants and to generate event-related hierarchical alignment of multiple genomes, which is realized by deciphering collinear genes produced by different polyploidization or speciation events. The Protocol guides users to infer ACKs and CETs in a plant taxon and between selected plants from different taxa, which is crucial to understand important sources of genetic innovation including chromosome evolution, genome complexity and origination and evolution of duplicated genes. This Protocol requires minimal bioinformatics knowledge, for example, retrieving data from public databases and running Python programs. Completing the protocol with the example data takes around 8 h.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40750714What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.