ArticleScientific reports2025
Predicting major amputation risk in diabetic foot ulcers using comparative machine learning models for enhanced clinical decision-making.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in the application of artificial intelligence-driven multi-modal imaging technologies in the comprehensive diagnosis and treatment of diabetic foot ulcers.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2026Review
- Comprehensive Management of Diabetic Foot Ulcers: Current Evidence and Practice.Journal of diabetes · 2026Review
- DFU-GCNet: a global context-enhanced inception network for robust and interpretable diabetic foot ulcer classification.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Staged management of infected diabetic foot ulcers: a 300-patient cohort study on prognostic grading, pathogen dynamics, and individualized risk prediction.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- A Machine-Learning-Based Clinical Decision Model for Predicting Amputation Risk in Patients with Diabetic Foot Ulcers: Diagnostic Performance and Practical Implications.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Predictors of Unfavorable Outcomes in Diabetic Foot Ulcers.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It is to develop a predictive model utilizing machine learning techniques to promptly identify patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) who may require major amputation upon their initial admission. A total of 598 DFU patients were admitted to a tertiary hospital in Beijing. We employed synthetic minority oversampling technique to address the class imbalance of the target variable in the original dataset. A Lasso regularization analysis identified 17 feature variables for inclusion in the model: age, diabetes duration, wound size, history of peripheral neuropathy, history of atrial fibrillation, white blood cell count, C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), myoglobin (Mb), troponin (Tn), blood urea nitrogen, serum albumin, triglycerides (TG), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, multidrug-resistant infection, vascular intervention. Subsequently, risk prediction models were independently developed by using these feature variables based on six machine learning algorithms: logistic regression, random forest, support vector machine, K-nearest neighbors, gradient boosting machine (GBM), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost). The performance of six models was evaluated to select the best model for predicting the risk of major amputation. GBM was identified as the best predictive model (accuracy 0.9408, precision 0.9855, recall 0.8553, F1-score 0.9158, and AUC 0.9499). This model also highlights the importance ranking of feature variables associated with predicting the risk of major amputation, with the top five variables being the presence of multidrug-resistant infection, CRP, diabetes duration, Tn, age. It is an effective machine learning method that GBM model is used to predict the risk of major amputations in diabetic foot patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.