ArticleBMC microbiology2025
Characterization of a lytic phage and its efficacy against carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in mice.
Article in BMC microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Phage Therapy in Combating Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Pathogens: A Scoping Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A comprehensive analysis of the kinetics of infection of lytic bacteriophages specific to the ESKAPE and critical pathogens.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026Review
- Characterization of a newly isolated broad-host-range lytic phage WEN7 against multidrug-resistant clinicalFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) has emerged as a significant global public health threat due to its increasing prevalence and dissemination, necessitating the development of novel antimicrobial agents. In this regard, bacteriophages, particularly lytic phages, offer a promising alternative to conventional antibiotics for the treatment of such resistant infections. In this study, we isolated and characterized a lytic Pseudomonas phage, Pa_WF01, from hospital sewage, which specifically targets clinical CRPA strains. The host range, multiplicity of infection (MOI), morphology, one-step growth curve, thermal and pH stability, chloroform sensitivity, and lytic activity of Pa_WF01 were evaluated. Our findings showed that the MOI, latent period, and burst size of Pa_WF01 were approximately 0.0001, 10 min, and 154 phages per cell, respectively. Furthermore, Pa_WF01 exhibited robust lytic activity across a broad range of pH values (4-12) and temperatures (4-50 °C), effectively inhibiting bacterial growth. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis supported that Pa_WF01 exhibits morphological characteristics similarity to the Schitoviridae family, and the result was further confirmed by phylogenetic analysis of complete genome sequences. Whole-genome sequencing revealed that Pa_WF01 has a double-stranded DNA genome of 73,369 bp and a GC content of 54.78%, containing 94 open reading frames (ORFs). Notably, no tRNA, virulence, or antibiotic resistance genes were identified within the genome. Phylogenetic tree analysis further classified Pa_WF01 as closely related to phages of the Litunavirus genus. In vivo, Pa_WF01 significantly improved the survival rate of mice infected with CRPA, reduced inflammatory responses, decreased bacterial loads in organs (lung, liver, and spleen), and alleviated organ damage. Additionally, in vitro analysis demonstrated that Pa_WF01 enhanced serum-mediated bactericidal activity. Taken together, these results highlight the potential of phage Pa_WF01 as a viable therapeutic alternative for treating CRPA infections in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.