SynthesisEuropean journal of medical research2025
Comprehensive evaluation of risk factors for intraventricular hemorrhage in preterm neonates: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in European journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sexually-dimorphic offspring outcomes following antenatal corticosteroids: a review of the evidence for congenital adrenal hyperplasia and preterm birth risk.Biology of sex differences · 2026Review
- Best evidence summary for the prevention of intraventricular hemorrhage in preterm infants: a systematic review.Translational pediatrics · 2026Review
- Neuroendoscopic lavage: a single-center retrospective cohort in the USA.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2025Article
- Risk factors for intraventricular hemorrhage in very low birth weight infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveIntraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality among preterm neonates, making early identification of risk factors critical to improving outcomes. Understanding both clinical conditions and therapeutic interventions associated with IVH can guide prevention and management strategies.
methodsA systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted, incorporating 30 studies that investigated various risk factors for IVH. The studies were categorized based on the clinical conditions and therapeutic interventions involved. The data were analyzed using pooled relative risks (RR) and heterogeneity assessments, including I
resultsThe analysis revealed several significant clinical risk factors for IVH. Male gender was associated with a 15% increased risk of IVH (pooled RR: 1.15, 95% CI 1.00-1.32), while low birth weight (< 1000g) was linked to a 94% increased risk (pooled RR: 1.94, 95% CI 1.38-2.73). Other significant factors included the presence of Apgar ≤ 5 or 7 (pooled RR: 2.14, 95% CI 1.69-2.72), asphyxia (pooled RR: 1.70, 95% CI 1.26-2.28), and thrombocytopenia (pooled RR: 1.34, 95% CI 1.10-1.62). Neonatal conditions such as respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) and hyaline membrane disease (HMD) were also found to increase IVH risk significantly. In terms of therapeutic interventions, antenatal steroids were associated with a reduced risk of IVH (pooled RR: 0.79, 95% CI 0.70-0.89), while mechanical ventilation, the use of catecholamines, surfactant administration increased IVH risk significantly (pooled RR for mechanical ventilation: 3.27, 95% CI 2.77-3.86; pooled RR for surfactant: 2.32, 95% CI 1.61-3.35).
conclusionSeveral clinical factors and therapeutic interventions are associated with the risk of IVH in neonates. These findings emphasize the importance of early identification and management of high-risk neonates, as well as the need for further research to refine prevention strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.