ArticleJournal of cellular and molecular medicine2025
Delineating Tissue-Specific Cell Identity of Oral Mucosa in Humans and Mice From a Single-Cell Perspective.
Article in Journal of cellular and molecular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The oral mucosa exhibits superior healing and minimal scarring. Although mouse models are widely used to study wound healing and various diseases, their translational relevance remains unclear. Here, we performed a comparative single-cell transcriptomic analysis of human and mouse oral mucosa to identify both shared and species-specific mechanisms. A total of 34,969 cells from human and mouse datasets were integrated using Harmony for batch effect correction, allowing us to establish a unified oral mucosa transcriptome atlas. Fibroblasts emerged as the prominent cell population in both species, displaying conserved gene expression profiles and cell communication networks, underscoring their central role in tissue homeostasis. Key pathways involved in extracellular matrix remodelling and wound healing were highly conserved, supporting the utility of mouse models for studying fibroblast-mediated tissue regeneration. These findings suggest that mouse models can effectively replicate human fibroblast biology, offering valuable insights for developing translational therapies that target fibroblast activity and regulatory gene networks to enhance wound healing and tissue regeneration. Additionally, we identified species-specific cell populations, including human-specific capillary endothelial cells and melanocytes, as well as mouse-specific salivary gland epithelial cells. Their distinct cellular composition and functional differences suggest that these subpopulations may not be directly translatable from mouse models to human contexts. Overall, our study highlights the evolutionary conservation of fibroblasts while identifying species-specific differences that warrant consideration in translational research. These findings provide a valuable resource for researchers using mouse models to study oral mucosa-related diseases, facilitating the translation of preclinical discoveries into clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.