Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40751826›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2025

Global, regional, and national burden of ovarian cancer in women aged 45 + from 1990 to 2021 and projections for 2050: a systematic analysis based on the 2021 global burden of disease study.

Yanan Ren, Ren Xu, Yazhuo Wang, LuYang Su, Jianzhi Su

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETosis) in gynecologic cancers: from pathogenesis to therapeutic opportunities: a narrative review.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Ovarian cancer.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yanan RenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang City, Hebei Province, China.
Ren XuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang City, Hebei Province, China.
Yazhuo WangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang City, Hebei Province, China.
LuYang SuPhysical Examination Center, Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang City, Hebei Province, China.
Jianzhi SuDepartment of Urology Surgery, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, China. 18533167591@hebmu.edu.cn.

Funding

This study was supported by Medical Science Research Project of Hebei NO.20240273
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOvarian cancer is the most common cause of gynecologic cancer-related deaths. We aimed to assess the global, regional, and national burdens and trends of Ovarian Cancer in Women Aged 45 + from 1990 to 2019 and Projections for 2050, utilizing data from the most recent Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2021 database.

methodsAge-standardized rates of incidence, prevalence, mortality, and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) were analyzed using GBD 2021 data. Temporal trends were assessed using estimated annual percentage change (EAPC). Regional disparities were examined via the Socio-Demographic Index (SDI). Age-Period-Cohort (APC) models assessed disease dynamics, while Bayesian APC (BAPC) modeling projected trends to 2050.

resultsIn 2021, global ovarian cancer incidence, prevalence, mortality, and DALYs in women aged 45 + were 239,682; 843,405; 171,246; and 4,352,539, respectively. The global burden declined significantly from 1990 to 2021 and is projected to remain stable through 2050. However, regional disparities persist: High and High-middle SDI regions saw decreases, while Middle to Low SDI regions experienced increases. Burden increased with SDI up to 0.8, then declined. Population growth was the primary contributor, followed by epidemiologic transitions and aging. The 55-59 age group showed the highest morbidity and DALYs; mortality peaked at 65-69 years.

conclusionsAlthough the overall burden of ovarian cancer in women aged 45 + is declining globally, marked regional disparities underscore the need for tailored prevention and treatment strategies to further reduce disease impact and improve outcomes.

Indexed as

Global Burden of DiseaseOvarian NeoplasmsAgedAged, 80 and overDisability-Adjusted Life YearsFemaleGlobal HealthHumansIncidenceMiddle AgedPrevalenceAge-period-cohort modelBayesian age-period-cohort projectionsDALYsGlobal burden of diseaseIncidenceOvarian cancerPrevalenceSocio-demographic index

Identifiers

PMID40751826
PMCPMC12317933

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.