Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40753147›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2026

Severity classification of obstructive sleep apnea using AASM and SEPAR criteria: A cross-sectional reclassification analysis.

Joaquín Nieto-Pino, Eva Retamal-Riquelme, Mario Henriquez-Beltrán, Matías Otto-Yañez, Rodrigo Torres-Castro, Gonzalo Labarca

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Joaquín Nieto-PinoUnidad de Sueño Adulto, Hospital Clínico La Florida, Santiago, Chile.
Eva Retamal-RiquelmeUnidad de Sueño Adulto, Hospital Clínico La Florida, Santiago, Chile.
Mario Henriquez-BeltránNúcleo de Investigación en Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Adventista de Chile, Chillán, Chile.
Matías Otto-YañezGrupo de Investigación en Salud, Funcionalidad y Actividad Física (GISFAF), Kinesiología, Facultad de Ciencias de La Salud, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Santiago, Chile. matiasotto.kine@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5784-275X
Rodrigo Torres-CastroDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Gonzalo LabarcaDepartamento de Enfermedades Respiratorias, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe severity of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is traditionally assessed using the Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI), as recommended by the American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM). However, the Spanish Society of Pulmonology and Thoracic Surgery (SEPAR) has proposed a multidimensional classification incorporating additional clinical factors. This study aimed to compare OSA severity distribution between the AASM and SEPAR classification systems in an adult population.

methodsA retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted. OSA severity was classified using AHI-based criteria (AASM) and SEPAR, which integrates total recording time with oxyhemoglobin saturation below 90% (T90%), body mass index (BMI), Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), and cardiovascular history (CV). Transition analysis was performed to evaluate reclassification patterns, and logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with higher severity categorization under SEPAR.

resultsThe SEPAR classification resulted in a higher proportion of cases categorized as severe compared to AASM (50.9% vs. 72.8%, p < 0.001). T90% and BMI were the primary contributors to this reclassification, with 24% of patients initially classified as moderate under AASM criteria reclassified as severe using SEPAR.

conclusionAHI-based classification alone may underestimate OSA severity, particularly in individuals with significant nocturnal hypoxemia or obesity. Integrating multidimensional criteria identifies a more considerable proportion of severe cases, with potential implications for treatment prioritization and risk stratification. These findings support the need for broader evaluation strategies in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Sleep Apnea, ObstructiveAdultAgedBody Mass IndexCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPolysomnographyRetrospective StudiesSeverity of Illness IndexAgreementClassificationNocturnal hypoxemiaObstructive sleep apnea

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.