ArticleBMC plant biology2025
Comparative analysis of 18 chloroplast genomes reveals genomic diversity and evolutionary dynamics in subtribe Malaxidinae (Orchidaceae).
Article in BMC plant biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rubus chingii chloroplast genome sequences: a comparative analysis with other Rubus L.chloroplast genomes.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Characterisation of the chloroplast genome of Macrotyloma species: comparative analysis and phylogenomic insights.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Comparative chloroplast genomics of Rutaceae: structural divergence, adaptive evolution, and phylogenomic implications.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe subtribe Malaxidinae encompasses diverse species, many of which possess remarkable medicinal properties that have been employed in traditional Chinese medicine for centuries. Although recent advancements have improved our understanding of the backbone phylogeny of Malaxidinae, clarifying the complex intergeneric relationships remains challenging, largely owing to limited genomic data. To address this gap and further investigate the genetic diversity and evolutionary patterns within this subtribe, we sequenced and assembled complete chloroplast (cp.) genomes from sixteen Malaxidinae species. These newly acquired genomic resources, combined with two previously published cp. genomes from closely related species, were incorporated into a comprehensive comparative genomic and phylogenomic analysis.
resultsThe complete cp. genomes of all 18 Malaxidinae species were analyzed, revealing lengths ranging from 143,062 bp to 158,785 bp. Each genome contains 123-133 genes, including 74-86 protein-coding genes, 38 tRNA genes, 8 rRNA genes and 1-8 pseudogenes. The chloroplast genomes of Malaxidinae species exhibit significant structural diversity, with particularly pronounced variations observed in the ndhF and ycf1 genes located at the IR/SSC boundary regions. In certain species, the SSC regions showed substantial size reduction, ranging from 10,224 to 15,582 bp. Notable variability in both gene loss and truncation patterns was observed in the ndh gene family across these species, accompanied by diverse modifications affecting the length, position, and pseudogenization of the ycf1 gene. Furthermore, our study identified genomic inversions and rearrangements occurring in both the LSC and SSC regions of specific species. The detection of abundant long dispersed repeats and SSRs provides valuable molecular markers for evaluating both intrageneric and interspecific polymorphism as well as genetic diversity patterns. Through codon usage bias analysis, we established that natural selection serves as the predominant evolutionary force shaping codon usage patterns in most Malaxidinae species. Detailed sequence alignment of the chloroplast genome revealed that structural variants are primarily concentrated within single-copy regions. Ten highly variable cpDNA markers were chosen as mutational hotspots, with the potential for development as DNA barcodes for Malaxidinae species. Our phylogenomic analysis clearly resolved the Malaxidinae into three well-supported major clades. Clade I comprises species of Liparis s.s., Malaxis, and Oberonioides. Clade II includes species of Crepidium, Dienia, Diteilis and Empusa. Clade III consists of species from the genera Blepharoglossum, Cestichis, Oberonia, Platystyliparis and Stichorkis.
conclusionThis research provides valuable insights into the unique characteristics of the chloroplast genome in Malaxidinae orchids, significantly advancing our comprehension of their evolutionary mechanisms and phylogenetic architecture. The acquired genomic data establish a crucial foundation to advance medical resources and aid in species differentiation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.