ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2025
The prognostic role of key factors in renal cell carcinoma with bone metastases.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Using Decision Tree to Predict Cancer-Specific Mortality in Patients with Clear Cell Renal Cancer Treated with Nephrectomy.Cancers · 2026Article
- Review
- Identification of risk factors for the development and prognosis of bone metastases in renal cell carcinoma: development and validation of a predictive model.American journal of cancer research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesOur study aims to investigate the factors associated with survival in patients with skeletal metastases of renal cell carcinoma and to outline the principles of managing patients with skeletal metastases using a multidisciplinary approach. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed 42 patients with clear cell metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) and bone metastases treated between 2005 and 2022. Demographics, tumor characteristics, metastasis patterns, surgical interventions, and systemic treatments were recorded. Survival outcomes were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and the Cox proportional hazards model. Factors such as MSKCC and IMDC risk scores, the number and location of metastases, and treatment modalities were evaluated for their prognostic impact.
resultsForty-two patients with a mean age of 58.4 years and a mean follow-up period of 28.4 months were included in the study. The 1-, 2-, and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 73.7%, 44.2%, and 13.7%, respectively. Solitary metastases (5-year OS 80%) and complete metastasectomy (5-year OS 20.1%) were associated with significantly improved survival. Diffuse metastases (HR 22.8; p = 0.006) and oligometastases (HR 7.7; p = 0.044) were associated with higher mortality compared to solitary lesions. Neither MSKCC nor IMDC scores were independently predictive of OS in multivariate analysis. Systemic therapies, including tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), mTOR inhibitors, antiresorptive agents, and radiotherapy, did not significantly impact survival outcomes.
conclusionThis study emphasizes that metastatic burden and achieving complete metastasectomy are the most critical factors for prolonged survival in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) with bone involvement. Systemic therapies alone provide limited benefit, highlighting the need for individualized, multidisciplinary treatment strategies. Prospective studies are warranted to refine prognostic models and optimize care for this challenging patient group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.