ArticleBMC anesthesiology2025
The predictive value of platelet parameters and hemorheological indicators for elderly sepsis patients.
Article in BMC anesthesiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sepsis is a life-threatening organ dysfunction. To explore the predictive value of platelet parameters and hemorheological indicators for mortality risk in elderly sepsis patients. The clinical data of 86 elderly patients with sepsis admitted to the intensive care unit of our hospital from June 2020 to June 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the survival outcome, the patients were divided into the death group (28 cases) and the survival group (58 cases). The platelet parameters and hemorheological indicators of the two groups were compared. Pearson correlation analysis was used to analyze platelet parameters, hemorheology and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA). Patients in the death group had higher APACHE II score, SOFA score, MPV, plasma viscosity, Equation K Value of ESR, and RDW than those in the survival group (P < 0.05). SOFA score was positively correlated with MPV, plasma viscosity, Equation K Value of ESR and RDW (P < 0.05), but not correlated with PLT and PDW (P < 0.05). APACHE II score, SOFA score, MPV, plasma viscosity, Equation K Value of ESR, and RDW were risk factors for mortality in elderly sepsis patients (P < 0.05). The joint prediction had higher performance than individual indicator (all P < 0.05). MPV, plasma viscosity, equation K value of ESR, and RDW were related to multiple organ failure in elderly sepsis patients, and could be used to predict the risk of death in patients, with good predictive performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.