Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40753395›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR2025

Sensitive detection of minimal residual disease and immunotherapy targets by multi-modal bone marrow analysis in high-risk neuroblastoma - a multi-center study.

Nina U Gelineau, Eva Bozsaky, Lieke M J van Zogchel, Fikret Rifatbegovic, Daria Lazic, Andrea Ziegler, Ahmad Javadi, Lily Zappeij-Kannegieter, Ulrike Pötschger, Marta Fiocco and 8 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. hNET-targeted [Theranostics · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. [Single-center application and analysis of neuroblastoma marker detection in childhood neuroblastoma].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Nina U GelineauPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Eva BozsakySt. Anna Children's Cancer Research Institute, Vienna, Austria.
Lieke M J van ZogchelPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Fikret RifatbegovicSt. Anna Children's Cancer Research Institute, Vienna, Austria.
Daria LazicSt. Anna Children's Cancer Research Institute, Vienna, Austria.
Andrea ZieglerSt. Anna Children's Cancer Research Institute, Vienna, Austria.
Ahmad JavadiSanquin Research and Landsteiner Laboratoryof the AMC- University of, Department of Experimental Immunohematology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Lily Zappeij-KannegieterSanquin Research and Landsteiner Laboratoryof the AMC- University of, Department of Experimental Immunohematology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Ulrike PötschgerSt. Anna Children's Cancer Research Institute, Vienna, Austria.
Marta FioccoPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Peter F AmbrosSt. Anna Children's Cancer Research Institute, Vienna, Austria.
Inge M AmbrosSt. Anna Children's Cancer Research Institute, Vienna, Austria.
Bernd BodenmillerInstitute of Molecular Health Sciences, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Ellen C van der SchootSanquin Research and Landsteiner Laboratoryof the AMC- University of, Department of Experimental Immunohematology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Ruth LadensteinSt. Anna Children's Cancer Research Institute, Vienna, Austria.
Marie Bernkopf *St. Anna Children's Cancer Research Institute, Vienna, Austria.
Godelieve A M Tytgat *Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands. g.a.m.tytgat@prinsesmaximacentrum.nl.
Sabine Taschner-Mandl *St. Anna Children's Cancer Research Institute, Vienna, Austria. Sabine.taschner@ccri.at.

Funding

Austrian Science Fund 10.55776/I4162KWF Kankerbestrijding TRANSCAN 8352/TRS-2018-00000715
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBone marrow dissemination of tumor cells, common in various cancers, including neuroblastoma, is associated with poor outcome, necessitating sensitive detection methods for bone marrow minimal residual disease (MRD) and offer detection of biomarkers for therapy stratification. Current standard-of-care diagnostics, involving cytomorphological and histological assessment of bone marrow aspirates and trephine biopsies, lack sensitivity, leading to undetected MRD in many patients, and do not allow molecular biomarker assessment.

methodsThis study evaluates advanced multi-modal high-sensitivity MRD detection techniques in 509 bone marrow specimens from 108 high-risk neuroblastoma patients across two centers. We employed automatic immunofluorescence plus interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (AIPF) and reverse transcriptase quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) panels to quantify disseminated tumor cells (DTCs), disialoganglioside 2 (GD2) and CD56/Neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM) levels, and adrenergic (ADRN) and mesenchymal (MES)-phenotype mRNA markers.

resultsThis multi-modal analysis significantly improved MRD detection compared to standard-of-care methods; 395 samples yielded results for RT-qPCR-ADRN, AIPF and CM/histology and 223 showed concordant results (64 positive, 159 negative). 114 samples did not produce results as either no cytospins were prepared (n = 96) or results were inconclusive (all techniques n = 18). AIPF and RT-qPCR complemented each other in detecting MRD and characterizing ADRN- and MES-phenotypes and GD2 immunotherapy target. RT-qPCR-ADRN alone frequently detected low tumor cell burden. High DTC infiltration at diagnosis showed bilateral bone marrow disease, whereas MRD settings often involved only one side. RT-qPCR-MES, despite lower sensitivity, identified 37 additional cases and showed delayed clearance of MES markers post-chemotherapy, with increases prior to relapse.

conclusionsOur findings demonstrate the feasibility of integrating high-sensitivity techniques with standard-of-care assessments in an international multicenter setting. Advanced multi-modal MRD detection, monitoring phenotype switches and assessing immunotherapy targets are crucial for improving patient outcomes in neuroblastoma and other cancers.

Indexed as

Bone MarrowImmunotherapyNeoplasm, ResidualNeuroblastomaAdolescentBiomarkers, TumorChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantMaleBiomarkers, TumorAutomated immunofluorescenceBone marrowLiquid biopsiesMetastasisMinimal residual diseaseNeuroblastomaRT-qPCR

Identifiers

PMID40753395
PMCPMC12317575

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.