ReviewBriefings in bioinformatics2025
Approaching the holistic transcriptome-convolution and deconvolution in transcriptomics.
Review in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Letter to the Editor regarding "Functions of dendrobine in a zebrafish model of diabetic retinopathy".Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- DeOPUS: cellular deconvolution via optimized power-transformed unmixing with shrinkage.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Integration of Bulk and Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Analyses in Biomedicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Evaluating reference-mixture matching in cell-type deconvolution with single-cell RNA-seq references.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Article
- Machine Learning Models for Cancer Research: A Narrative Review of Bulk RNA-Seq Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Applications of AI to single-cell and spatial transcriptomics: current state-of-the-art and challenges.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tissues, organs, and entire organisms are composed of diverse cell populations, which are characterized by cell-type-specific gene activities. Bulk RNA-seq represents a robust, cost-effective, scalable method to measure gene activity at the bulk tissue level. However, pathomolecular processes lead to divergent changes in tissue composition and cell-type-specific gene deregulations, which cannot be resolved at the tissue bulk level without information on either change in cell-type proportion or expression at the single-cell level. Accordingly, methods have been developed that constrain bulk deconvolution by information from single-cell expression or cell-type proportion. In parallel, convolution methods have been developed to project single-cell expression to bulk tissue level (pseudobulk simulation). In the present review, we provide an overview of existing convolution and deconvolution methods, their interconnectivity, and benchmarking. Our unique approach lies in the joint consideration of both directions in a "holistic transcriptome model." Through analysis of published (de)convolution studies and benchmarks, we identified the reduced availability of suitable datasets and the use of inaccurate convolution-like methods for (de)convolution model assessment and training as key bottlenecks in the field. On that basis, we conclude with a holistic transcriptome model envisioning that a more integral approach to convolution and deconvolution is needed. With our suggestions for a unified framework we aim to spark collaborative efforts to enable major leaps forward in the field of (de)convolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.