ArticleBMJ open2025
Effects of a digital tool implementing the German S3 clinical practice guideline for multimorbidity in primary care (gp-multitool.de): study protocol for a cluster-randomised controlled trial.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06831994 (Digital Implementation of the German S3 Clinical Practice Guideline for Primary Care of Older Patients With Multimorbidity - a Cluster-randomised Clinical Evaluation Study), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Digital Implementation of the German S3 Clinical Practice Guideline for Primary Care of Older Patients With Multimorbidity - a Cluster-randomised Clinical Evaluation Study (Gp-multitool.de)
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMultimorbidity is prevalent and associated with complex treatment requirements. In order to assist general practitioners (GPs) addressing these requirements, the web application gp-multitool.de has been designed, which facilitates implementation of the German clinical practice guideline for multimorbidity. We will conduct a cluster-randomised clinical trial evaluating an intervention based on this tool. This protocol summarises methods and discusses ethics and dissemination of this study. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Participating patients are recruited by cooperating GP practices. Inclusion criteria are an age of 65 years or older, enrolment in any disease management programme and multimorbidity operationalised by two additional chronic conditions. To avoid postrandomisation selection bias, practices are randomised as clusters after baseline assessment of all participating patients from the respective practice. In our intervention, patients receive access to different assessments including patient preferences by email, fill out the electronic assessment forms on any device with access to the internet, receive a medication review and discuss the assessment results with their GPs. GPs in the control group do not have access to the digital tool and provide care as usual. The primary outcome is staying at least once for at least one night in hospital during the 12-month observation period. Secondary outcomes are contacts with GPs and outpatient specialists, self-reported health, health-related quality of life, patient satisfaction and GP-reported and patient-reported quality of care. A sample size of 660 patients from 66 GP practices is needed. Data are analysed by mixed effects regression models. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was obtained by the ethics committee of the Medical Association of Hamburg (2022-1 00 786-BO-ff). Study results will be presented on scientific conferences and published in journal articles. In addition, healthcare professionals, patient representatives and the interested public will be informed about study results at a symposium. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The study was registered in clinicaltrials.gov (NCT06831994).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.