SynthesisNeurosurgical review2025
Comparative outcomes of coil embolization and surgical clipping in elderly patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesElderly patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) face a disproportionately high burden of morbidity and mortality. While endovascular coiling is often favored in this population, direct comparisons with surgical clipping are limited. We conducted a meta-analysis to compare outcomes of clipping versus coiling in SAH patients aged ≥ 60 years.
methodsA systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases identified studies comparing the two treatments in this age group. The primary outcome was a composite of unfavorable outcomes (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] > 2 and mortality). Secondary outcomes included mortality, favorable outcome (mRS 0-2), rebleeding, and hospital length of stay. Heterogeneity was assessed using I² statistics, with subgroup analysis by age decade.
resultsTwenty-seven studies (2 randomized controlled trials [RCTs]) involving 51,415 patients (59.6% treated with clipping) were included. There were no significant differences between clipping and coiling for unfavorable outcome (RR 1.03; 95% CI 0.96-1.11), favorable outcome (RR 1.02; 95% CI 0.93-1.11), mortality (RR 1.08; 95% CI 0.97-1.19), or rebleeding (RR 1.21; 95% CI 0.57-2.57). However, coiling was associated with shorter hospital stays (MD -2.53 days; 95% CI -4.58 to -0.49; p = 0.0152). RCTs showed a non-significant trend favoring coiling, while observational studies leaned toward clipping. Heterogeneity for main outcomes was moderate (I² = 57.7%). Using the GRADE framework, overall certainty of evidence was rated very low, mainly due to the predominance of non-randomized studies, moderate risk of bias, and inconsistency across studies.
conclusionsIn SAH patients aged ≥ 60 years, clipping and coiling show comparable outcomes, with coiling associated with shorter hospital stays. Given the very low certainty of evidence, these findings should be interpreted with caution. Prospective multicenter cohorts are needed to establish more definitive evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.