ReviewTranslational gastroenterology and hepatology2025
Machine learning in the differential diagnosis of ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease: a systematic review.
Review in Translational gastroenterology and hepatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent Advances in Artificial Intelligence for Endoscopic and Multimodal Assessment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Review.International journal of general medicine · 2026Review
- Orally Administered CBD/CBG Hemp Extract Reduces Severity of Ulcerative Colitis and Pain in a Murine Model.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Utility of Machine Learning to Characterize Gut Microbiota Dysbiosis and Its Clinical Implications in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.Journal of inflammation research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a complex chronic disease of the gastrointestinal tract. This systematic review aimed at highlighting the latest findings on the use of machine learning (ML) in the IBD subtypes, ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease (CD), with a view to obtaining a basis for the clinical application of ML to differentiate between these subtypes. Methods: We conducted an extensive search of six major databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Ovid, for entries made between 1 January 2000 and 28 November 2024. The search was focused on identifying studies that used ML to construct diagnostic models for ulcerative colitis and CD. Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies was used to assess the risk of bias and concerns about the applicability of these studies. The protocol for this review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024543036). Results: After a rigorous screening and assessment process, 31 papers were found to be suitable for inclusion in the review, with a total sample size of 15,140. Most of the included studies were retrospective (n=27, 87%), with the vast majority of studies (n=20, 65%) published between 2021 and 2023. Random forest (RF) was identified as the most commonly used (n=10, 32%), followed by support vector machines (n=9, 29%), and the majority of the studies were focused on model evaluation metrics of ML. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that ML holds the potential to enhance diagnostic accuracy in distinguishing between ulcerative colitis and CD, particularly through the utilization of models developed from endoscopic and fecal biomarker data based on deep learning and RF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.