Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40755928›Full record

ArticlemHealth2025

Transforming daily support with multidisciplinary teleassistance: impact on health parameters in older adults-a randomized controlled trial.

Andressa Crystine da Silva Sobrinho, Guilherme da Silva Rodrigues, Karine Pereira Rodrigues, Larissa Chacon Finzeto, Laura T D V Sampaio, Guilherme Carvalho Daniel, João Paulo de Freitas, João Gabriel Ribeiro de Lima, Grace Angélica Oliveira Gomes, Carlos Roberto Bueno Júnior

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mHealth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Andressa Crystine da Silva SobrinhoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo (USP), Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Guilherme da Silva RodriguesDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo (USP), Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Karine Pereira RodriguesDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo (USP), Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Larissa Chacon FinzetoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo (USP), Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Laura T D V SampaioDepartment of Gerontology, Federal University of São Carlos (UFSCAR), São Carlos, SP, Brazil.
Guilherme Carvalho DanielDepartment of Nursing, Ribeirão Preto School of Nursing, University of São Paulo (USP), Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
João Paulo de FreitasDepartment of Nursing, Ribeirão Preto School of Nursing, University of São Paulo (USP), Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
João Gabriel Ribeiro de LimaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo (USP), Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Grace Angélica Oliveira GomesDepartment of Gerontology, Federal University of São Carlos (UFSCAR), São Carlos, SP, Brazil.
Carlos Roberto Bueno JúniorDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo (USP), Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Home care and teleassistance emerge as effective, patient-centered approaches to meet the healthcare needs of older adults, enabling them to remain in familiar environments while receiving personalized care. Despite technological advancements driving teleassistance, the success of these interventions hinges on the acceptance and adherence of older person and their caregivers. This study explores the impact of teleassistance on older adults' health, focusing on daily and simple care, through a randomized clinical trial. Methods: Individuals aged 60 years or older were recruited and divided into two groups: the application group (APPG, n=21) and the control group (CG, n=19). Various anthropometric, motor, clinical, and biochemical measures were utilized for participant assessments. Throughout the 14-week experimental period, participants utilized the "Viva" application, receiving teleassistance and educational resources. Personalized support was provided to address any difficulties. Results: The study demonstrated that the "Viva" application had significant positive impacts on the health and well-being of older adult participants. Specifically, the APPG showed no-table improvements in flexibility [sit and reach (S&R): +5.1 cm, P<0.001], lower limb strength [sit and stand test (S&ST): +5.2 reps, P<0.001], and walking performance [6-minute walk test (6MWT): +41.3 m, P<0.001], compared to the CG. Additionally, the APPG exhibited enhanced overall health (P<0.001), cognitive function [Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA): +4.7 points, P<0.001], and significant reductions in total cholesterol levels (-25 mg/dL, P<0.05). These findings were complemented by improvements in healthy food consumption patterns, reduced daytime sleepiness, and greater health literacy, further emphasizing the application's role in promoting healthy aging and improved quality of life. With technological advances and expanding internet access, telecare has the potential. Conclusions: With technological advances and expanding internet access, telecare has the potential to revolutionize care for older adults by enabling them to safely and autonomously remain at home while receiving personalized support. This study demonstrated significant improvements in health outcomes, including reduced sedentary time, enhanced physical activity, better sleep quality, lower cholesterol levels, improved cognitive function, and healthier dietary habits in the teleassisted group. These results highlight teleassistance as an essential strategy for promoting healthy and active aging, reducing the risk of chronic diseases, and improving the overall quality of life for older adults. Trial Registration: This study is registered in the Brazilian Clinical Trials Registry (RBR-6wgkzs8).

Indexed as

assistive technologyautonomy in careGeriatric telecarepatient-centered healthremote care

Identifiers

PMID40755928
PMCPMC12314694

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.