Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40755969›Full record

ReviewClinical kidney journal2025

Desensitization in HLA-incompatible kidney transplant recipients: current strategies and emerging perspectives.

Mahmut Altindal, Mustafa Guldan, Lasin Ozbek, Sama Mahmoud Abdel-Rahman, Selen Unlu, Ahmet Murt, Nuri B Hasbal, Abdulmecit Yildiz, Charles J Ferro, Adrian Covic and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical kidney journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Mahmut AltindalDepartment of Medicine, Section of Nephrology, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Mustafa GuldanDepartment of Medicine, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Lasin OzbekDepartment of Medicine, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Sama Mahmoud Abdel-RahmanDepartment of Medicine, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Selen UnluDepartment of Medicine, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ahmet MurtDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey.
Nuri B HasbalDepartment of Medicine, Section of Nephrology, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2229-5140
Abdulmecit YildizDivision of Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, Bursa Uludag University, Nilufer, Bursa, Turkey.
Charles J FerroDepartment of Renal Medicine, University Hospitals Birmingham and Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0577-7081
Adrian CovicNephrology Clinic, Dialysis and Renal Transplant Center, "C.I. Parhon" University Hospital, Iasi, Romania.
Caner SüsalTransplant Immunology Research Center of Excellence TIREX, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2521-8201
Mehmet KanbayDepartment of Medicine, Section of Nephrology, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1297-0675

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite development of kidney paired donation programs and prioritization in kidney allocation schemes, transplantation rates are still low and waiting times remain prolonged for highly sensitized kidney transplant recipients with broad human leukocyte antigen antibody reactivity. Desensitization confers an invaluable option improving access to kidney transplantation for sensitized patients who could not benefit from kidney paired donation programs and kidney allocation schemes. Conventional desensitization strategies use intravenous immunoglobulin combined with either plasmapheresis or monoclonal anti-CD20 antibodies. Imlifidase, IL-6 targeting agents, plasma cell-directed therapies, complement inhibitors, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies, and B cell-activating factor inhibitors are emerging new options in the hope of enhancing and sustaining the efficacy of desensitization to improve allograft longevity. In this review, we discuss the rationale and outcome of desensitization with various strategies alone or in combination. Our aim is also to provide some insight for decision when pursuing desensitization might be successful or futile in sensitized patients.

Indexed as

CAR T-cell therapiesdesensitizationkidney transplantationplasma cell-directed therapiesplasmapheresis

Identifiers

PMID40755969
PMCPMC12315108

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.