Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40756313›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025

Graph learning based suicidal ideation detection via tree-drawing test.

Ye Liu, Jiashuo Zheng, Yang Zeng, Fang Luo, Xuetao Tian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ye LiuSchool of Future Technology, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
Jiashuo ZhengSchool of Future Technology, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
Yang ZengFaculty of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Fang LuoFaculty of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Xuetao TianFaculty of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Adolescent suicide is a critical public health concern worldwide, necessitating effective methods for early detection of high suicidal ideation. Traditional detection methods, such as self-report scales, suffer from limited accuracy and are susceptible to personal concealment. Automatic methods based on artificial intelligence techniques are more accurate, while they often lack scalability due to strict data requirements. In order to achieve a balance between accuracy and scalability, this paper introduces the Tree-Drawing Test (TDT) as an effective tool for suicidal ideation detection, and proposes a novel graph learning approach to enable its automatic application. Methods: The proposed method first constructs a semantic graph based on psychological features annotated automatically from tree-drawing images, and leverages a Graph Convolutional Network (GCN) model to realize individual suicidal ideation detection. To evaluate this method, a real dataset of 806 students from primary and secondary school in Shaanxi Province, China, is collected, and some metrics including macro-F1, G-mean, and false positive rate are used. Results: The results demonstrate that the proposed method significantly outperforms traditional machine learning and convolution neural network approaches. The ablation study demonstrates the effectiveness of feature "leaves and fruits" in detecting suicidal ideation. Further experiments demonstrate that the proposed method remains stable even when the model is disturbed, such as when a tree-drawing image cannot be fully represented. Discussion: The proposed method highlights its effectiveness in large-scale suicidal ideation screening, as it not only achieves high detection performance but also maintains model stability while remaining flexible and adaptable.

Indexed as

graph convolutional networkgraph learningprojective testsuicidal ideation detectiontree-drawing test

Identifiers

PMID40756313
PMCPMC12314756

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.