ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2025
Operative Treatment of Medial Impingement Syndrome of the Ankle Concomitant With Osteochondral Lesion of the Medial Talar Dome: When and How?
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Coexisting medial impingement syndrome of the ankle (MIA) is often observed when planning surgical treatment for medial osteochondral lesion of the talus (OLT). To date, there is no clear consensus on the surgical indications for MIA in relation to medial OLT or on whether overtreatment or undertreatment is preferable. Purpose: To investigate when and how MIAs should be treated in patients with concomitant medial OLT. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: A total of 47 patients diagnosed with medial OLT and concomitant MIA were prospectively evaluated between January 2020 and June 2023. Patients were enrolled when they tested positive for the MIA provocation test (pain at the medial malleolus was exacerbated with ankle varus and dorsiflexion maneuvers) and randomly assigned to either the solitary medial OLT treatment group (group 1; n = 23 patients) or the simultaneous medial OLT and MIA treatment group (group 2; n = 24 patients). In group 2, osteophytes associated with MIA were addressed using a combined arthroscopic and miniopen approach along with the microfracture technique for medial OLT, whereas in group 1, only a solitary arthroscopic microfracture was performed. The minimum follow-up duration for inclusion in this study was 12 months. Results: The clinical parameters at the final follow-up significantly improved postoperatively in both groups, and the values at the final follow-up did not significantly differ between the 2 groups. However, the rate of pain elicitation during the MIA provocation test at the final follow-up was significantly greater in group 1 than in group 2 (72.2% vs 10.5%; Conclusion: Although the results of our study alone cannot conclusively determine that surgical treatment is necessarily required for MIA concomitant with medial OLT, the significant postoperative reduction in pain elicited during the MIA provocation test was observed in patients who underwent simultaneous MIA resection. Considering the relatively less technically demanding nature of the surgical technique introduced in this study, we recommend proactive resection in patients with both MIA and medial OLT where pain is elicited during the MIA provocation test preoperatively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.