ArticleAmerican journal of preventive cardiology2025
A comparative analysis of cardiovascular disease mortality trends attributable to risk factors in the United States and globally from 1990 to 2019: an analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.
Article in American journal of preventive cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in hypertensive patients by combining the CHG index and its obesity indicators: a prospective cohort study with survival prediction model.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2026Article
- Trends in atrial fibrillation and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease-related mortality in the United States from 1999 to 2020: a CDC WONDER analysis.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Review
- AJPC academy: A four-pillar model for cultivating the next generation of academic leaders in cardiovascular prevention.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2026Article
- Cholesterol-to-Lymphocyte Ratio as a Predictor of 1-Year Unplanned Readmission in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Retrospective Cohort Study.International journal of general medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Trends in cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality from key risk factors both in the United States (US) and globally have not been well characterized. Methods: This analysis utilized Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2019 data to determine age-standardized mortality rates (ASMR) and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for CVDs attributed to risk factors in the US and globally. Total percentage change (TPC, 95 % CI) was calculated to assess temporal trends in CVD mortality and disease burden related to key risk factors, examining two periods: 1990-2010 and 2010-2019. Results: Overall CVD mortality declined in the US and globally from 1990-2019. CVD mortality declined globally by a TPC of -0.24 (-0.26 to -0.22) between 1990-2010 but only by -0.11 (-0.15 to -0.07) between 2010-2019. Similar changes were seen in the US. CVD mortality attributed to common risk factors, including dietary risks, high LDL-c, kidney dysfunction, smoking, and secondhand smoking, changed significantly between 2010-2019 compared to the prior two decades, with slower declines in CVD mortality both globally and in the US. Furthermore, CVD mortality attributed to high body mass index, elevated fasting plasma glucose, and elevated systolic blood pressure in the US plateaued from 2010-2019. Trends in DALYs attributed to these risk factors paralleled those observed for mortality. Conclusions: Despite major reductions in CVD mortality and disease burden from 1990 to 2010, mortality linked to key risk factors plateaued globally and in the US after 2010. Continued public health efforts targeting key risk factors are needed to further reduce CVD-related mortality and disability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.