ReviewSAGE open medicine2025
Glycemic management in patients with immune-related diabetes mellitus: A scoping review.
Review in SAGE open medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A network meta-analysis of endocrine adverse events induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors in colorectal cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced diabetes mellitus in metastatic NSCLC: a case report with extended follow-up and management considerations.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors therapy in cancer patients may induce immune-related diabetes mellitus through islet β-cell destruction, necessitating systematic glycemic management. This scoping review aims to identify and synthesize evidence on glycemic management strategies for immune-related diabetes mellitus. Guided by Arksey and O'Malley's five-stage scoping review framework, we strictly adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews checklist. A systematic search was conducted across guideline repositories, academic databases, and professional oncology/endocrinology association websites. The search period spanned from database inception to June 30, 2024. Of 5085 initially identified records, 9 studies met inclusion criteria. Evidence was synthesized into five key domains: (1) risk assessment and early detection, (2) therapeutic interventions and monitoring, (3) patient education, (4) glycemic target optimization, and (5) multidisciplinary care coordination. This review consolidates evidence-based best practices for immune-related diabetes mellitus management derived from rigorous methodology. Clinicians should tailor these strategies to individual patient profiles to optimize outcomes while mitigating treatment disruptions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.