Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40756789›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of sports physical therapy2025

Running Retraining Technique and Neuromuscular Exercises in Runners with Patellofemoral Pain: A Scoping Review.

Miguel Farraj, Thomas Guilhem, Joachim Van Cant, Alexandre Rambaud

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of sports physical therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Miguel FarrajFaculty of Human Movement Sciences, Research Unit in Rehabilitation Sciences Université Libre de Bruxelles.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-2211-0091
Thomas GuilhemIFMK Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Étienne.
Joachim Van CantSFMKS-Lab.
Alexandre RambaudIFMK Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Étienne.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4589-850X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: When treating runners with patellofemoral pain (PFP), clinicians aim to reduce patients' symptoms, such as pain and discomfort. Running retraining techniques (RRT) and neuromuscular exercises (NME) are key interventions to achieve these goals. Purpose: This scoping review examined the use of RRT and NME, either combined or standalone, in runners with PFP. Study design: Scoping review. Methods: Databases searched included MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar. Two researchers independently identified eligible studies and extracted data. The scoping review followed the PRISMA-SCR framework, using population, concept, and context criteria. The population included recreational to professional runners over 18 years with PFP, excluding those involved in any sport other than running., as well as those with prior knee surgeries, the history or presence of other knee pathologies, or pediatric populations. The review focused on studies utilizing NME or RRT for PFP treatment, adhering to ACSM guidelines and excluding studies only providing study protocols. Exercise reporting was assessed using the Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template. NME protocols were analyzed using the FITT framework (Frequency, Intensity, Time, Type). RRT protocols were evaluated by session frequency, start timing, clinician input, cadence, feedback, footwear use, speed changes, self-rehabilitation, and progression. Results: Fifteen studies were reviewed. The timing and complementarity of RRT with NME were often absent or poorly defined. NME mainly focused on single-leg squats in seven protocols, with forward lunges, step-downs, and trunk-rotating squats in three studies each. These exercises emphasized trunk inclination and gluteal activation, with variations in feedback, sets, reps, and progression. RRT treatment ranged from a single 10-minute retraining session to 12 weekly sessions. Cadence increase was addressed in six studies, dynamic valgus in four, with most feedback being auditory/visual. Minimalist shoes were used in two studies, and three standardized running speed. Conclusion: A notable variability exists in interventions for PFP in runners, especially in the timing and complementarity of RRT and NME. A standardized reporting system is needed to better analyze study protocol implementation. Level of Evidence: N/A.

Indexed as

Gait re-trainingneuromuscular exercisepatellofemoral painrunning re-training

Identifiers

PMID40756789
PMCPMC12317788

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.