ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2025
Model-Informed Precision Dosing of Infliximab in Korean Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients: External Validation of Population Pharmacokinetic Models.
Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Interleukin-23p19 Inhibitors in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: From Current Insights to Future Directions.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Underexposure to infliximab often leads to loss of response in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) offers a superior approach to maintaining target infliximab concentrations compared to empirical dosage adjustment. This study aims to externally validate the population pharmacokinetic (PK) models implemented in TDMx, an online MIPD dashboard system, for adult and pediatric Korean IBD patients before clinical use. This retrospective study included 199 IBD patients (142 adults, 57 children) treated with intravenous infliximab at Seoul National University Hospital (Seoul, Republic of Korea) from 2019 to 2023. Three adult and seven pediatric models were evaluated based on accuracy, precision, goodness of fit plots, prediction-corrected visual predictive checks, and normalized prediction distribution errors. For adults, the Passot model showed the best fit (mean percentage error (MPE) 26.4%, mean absolute error (MAE) 1.1 mg/L, relative root-mean square error (rRMSE) 159.0%), whereas all pediatric models were unsuitable for clinical use (MPE 30.4%-143.4%, MAE 1.4-2.6 mg/L, rRMSE 96.3%-564.0%). Predictive performance was compared between datasets with or without accurate information on antibodies-toward-infliximab (ATI), as well as with and without previous concentrations. Assuming all patients were ATI positive improved predictive performance, likely due to the inherent positive bias of the population PK models. Incorporating previous concentrations improved predictions for adult models, achieving acceptable accuracy and precision (Passot model: MPE 17.5%, MAE 1.8 mg/L, rRMSE 80.3% with one concentration). However, pediatric models remained clinically unacceptable, highlighting the need to develop models specifically tailored for this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.