Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40758278›Full record

ReviewBiochemical Society transactions2025

The states of senescent cells.

Laura Boose de Mendonça, Guido Lenz, Eduardo Cremonese Filippi-Chiela

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biochemical Society transactions, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Laura Boose de MendonçaCentro de Biotecnologia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul 91501-970, Brazil.
Guido LenzCentro de Biotecnologia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul 91501-970, Brazil.
Eduardo Cremonese Filippi-ChielaCentro de Biotecnologia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul 91501-970, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8192-3779

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Senescent cells (SnCs) have typical changes in multiple features, such as increased cellular and nuclear size, morphofunctional alterations in organelles, and high secretory activity. The literature generally groups cellular changes and the non-proliferative character of SnCs into the autonomous senescent phenotype. In contrast, the influence of molecules and extracellular vesicles secreted by SnCs characterizes their non-autonomous phenotype. Unlike the detailed characterization of the structure of SnCs, the discussion regarding SnC states, which are characterized by the comprehensive integration of multiple features a cell harbors in a given moment, is still incipient. This review discusses the possible SnC states (SenStates) and their influence in pathophysiological contexts. We also discuss the main mechanisms and molecular players involved in the establishment and dynamics of these states, such as transcription factors, epigenetic marks, chromatin structure, and others. Finally, we discuss the biological relevance and potential clinical applications of SenStates, as well as open questions in the field.

Indexed as

Cellular SenescenceAnimalsChromatinEpigenesis, GeneticHumansTranscription FactorsChromatinTranscription Factorscell statecellular senescencephenotypic dynamicsphenotypic heterogeneitysenescence-associated secretory phenotype

Identifiers

PMID40758278
PMCPMC12409999

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.