ArticlePloS one2025
The impact of antimicrobial stewardship interventions on surgical antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines compliance in a teaching hospital in Ghana.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antibiotic usage in surgical prophylaxis: surveillance of clean and clean-contaminated surgeries in a tertiary care hospital.Frontiers in public health · 2026Observational
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInappropriate use of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP) to prevent surgical site infections (SSIs) is noted to be a major contributor of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) globally, including Ghana. This study sought to assess the impact of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) interventions on SAP guideline compliance and other surgical outcomes including SSI and length of hospital stay.
methodThis was a nine-month quasi-experimental (before- and after-intervention) study. Four months' medical records of 150 obstetric and gynecological surgery patients were collected both before (baseline) and after the implementation of AMS interventions in a teaching hospital in Ghana. The interventions included education on the hospital SAP guidelines and feedback of the baseline survey results to the surgical team. An adapted data collection sheet was used to collect medical records of the included patients. A descriptive analysis was performed, a Pearson's chi-square test and a two-sample Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney U) rank-sum test were used to assess the impact of the interventions.
resultsMost (n = 220/300, 73.33%) of the patients were between the ages of 24-44 years, and the commonest surgery was an emergency caesarean section (n = 92/300, 30.67%). After the AMS interventions, there was a significant improvement in guideline compliance due to appropriate antibiotic choice (p = 0.001). duration (p < 0.001), and the volume of consumption of SAP (p < 0.001). There were no significant changes in the timing of administration (p = 0.636), SSI rate (p = 0.054), and the length of hospital stay (p = 0.161).
conclusionOur study showed positive impact of the two AMS interventions on SAP guideline compliance based on the choice and duration of prescription, and reduction of the volume of antibiotic utilization, but not on the timing of administration. This did not worsen the SSI rate and patient length of stay. Hospitals in Ghana and beyond are encouraged to optimize SAP use and prevent rising AMR rates by implementing appropriate educational programmes and dissemination of audit findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.