Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40758758›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2025

Beyond recombination: Exploring the impact of meiotic frequency on genome-wide genetic diversity.

Louis Ollivier, Brian Charlesworth, Fanny Pouyet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Towards an evolutionary baseline model ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Louis OllivierUniversité Paris-Saclay, CNRS, Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire des Sciences du Numérique, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1177-6202
Brian CharlesworthInstitute of Ecology and Evolution, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Fanny PouyetUniversité Paris-Saclay, CNRS, Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire des Sciences du Numérique, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5614-6998

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An important aim of population genetics is to elucidate the processes affecting genetic diversity across regions of the genome and across species. Canonical population genetic models of sexually reproducing species define the rate of meiotic recombination in terms of the frequency of recombination events per site per sexual generation. This paper studies the interplay of several factors with respect to their effects on neutral genetic diversity in a facultatively sexual, diploid, unicellular species such as yeast. The relevant factors are the prevalence of meiosis versus mitosis, the recombination rate, and the selection and dominance coefficients at loci under positive selection. We assume that many generations of mitotic cell divisions are interspersed with episodes of sexual reproduction, in which all individuals in the population undergo meiosis, followed by random matings among the resulting gametes. Our findings reveal that a single hard selective sweep can reduce neutral nucleotide site diversity across the entire genome, provided that the frequency of meiotic events is sufficiently low, and that the effects of a selective sweep on levels of neutral diversity at sites linked to the target of selection can be markedly different from those predicted by standard models of sweeps based on obligate sexuality. Species that reproduce by facultative sex are thus likely to exhibit unusual patterns of genetic diversity.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationMeiosisRecombination, GeneticGenetics, PopulationMitosisModels, GeneticSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSelection, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID40758758
PMCPMC12408092

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.