Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40759979›Full record

ArticleGenome medicine2025

varCADD: large sets of standing genetic variation enable genome-wide pathogenicity prediction.

Lusiné Nazaretyan, Philipp Rentzsch, Martin Kircher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. AlphaGenome Atlas:medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lusiné NazaretyanBerlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, 10117, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5820-4143
Philipp RentzschBerlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, 10117, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0413-7974
Martin KircherBerlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, 10117, Germany. martin.kircher@uni-luebeck.de.ORCID 0000-0001-9278-5471

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 517993632
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMachine learning and artificial intelligence are increasingly being applied to identify phenotypically causal genetic variation. These data-driven methods require comprehensive training sets to deliver reliable results. However, large unbiased datasets for variant prioritization and effect predictions are rare as most of the available databases do not represent a broad ensemble of variant effects and are often biased towards the protein-coding genome, or even towards few well-studied genes.

methodsTo overcome these issues, we propose several alternative training sets derived from subsets of human standing variation. Specifically, we use variants identified from whole-genome sequences of 71,156 individuals contained in gnomAD v3.0 and approximate the benign set with frequent standing variation and the deleterious set with rare or singleton variation. We apply the Combined Annotation Dependent Depletion framework (CADD) and train several alternative models using CADD v1.6.

resultsUsing the NCBI ClinVar validation set, we demonstrate that the alternative models have state-of-the-art accuracy, globally on par with deleteriousness scores of CADD v1.6 and v1.7, but also outperforming them in certain genomic regions. Being larger than conventional training datasets, including the evolutionary-derived training dataset of about 30 million variants in CADD, standing variation datasets cover a broader range of genomic regions and rare instances of the applied annotations. For example, they cover more recent evolutionary changes common in gene regulatory regions, which are more challenging to assess with conventional tools.

conclusionsStanding variation allows us to directly train state-of-the-art models for genome-wide variant prioritization or to augment evolutionary-derived variants in training. The proposed datasets have several advantages, like being substantially larger and potentially less biased. Datasets derived from standing variation represent natural allelic changes in the human genome and do not require extensive simulations and adaptations to annotations of evolutionary-derived sequence alterations used for CADD training. We provide datasets as well as trained models to the community for further development and application.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationGenome, HumanGenome-Wide Association StudyComputational BiologyDatabases, GeneticGenomicsHumansMachine LearningSoftwareData biasesStanding variationTraining dataVariant effect predictionVariant prioritization

Identifiers

PMID40759979
PMCPMC12323237

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.