ArticleWorld journal of urology2025
Unsupervised machine learning approach to interpret complex lower urinary tract symptoms and their impact on quality of life in adult women.
Article in World journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Symptom Bother Is Associated With Medical Care-Seeking for LUTS in Japanese Women: A Survey of 1800 Women.Lower urinary tract symptoms · 2026Article
- Subgroups of lower urinary tract symptoms in men and their association with patient-centered outcomes: a cluster analysis of the 2023 Japan community health survey.World journal of urology · 2026Article
- Determining the smallest worthwhile difference of beta-3 agonist treatment for overactive bladder: a benefit-harm trade-off study.World journal of urology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo identify clinically meaningful clusters of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in adult women using an unsupervised machine learning approach and to examine their associations with patient-centered outcomes, including quality of life (QoL), willingness to pay (WTP) for treatment, and physician visits.
methodsWe analyzed data from 3,088 women aged ≥ 20 years in a 2023 nationwide Japanese internet-based epidemiological survey on LUTS. Principal component analysis reduced dimensionality across 16 LUTS, including storage, voiding, and post-voiding symptoms, as well as bladder pain and discomfort. Hierarchical clustering grouped participants based on symptom severity. QoL, WTP, and physician visits were compared among clusters.
resultsThree symptom-based clusters were identified: the mild/asymptomatic group (n = 1,635, 52.9%), the moderate storage symptom-dominant group (n = 1,224, 39.6%), and the severe complex group (n = 229, 7.4%). The identified groups had substantially different demographic characteristics and LUTS risk factors. The severe complex group, experiencing the highest symptom burden, was most affected in daily life, emotions, sleep/energy, personal relationships, and role, physical, and social limitations. The median monthly WTP was ¥500 ($3.5) in the mild/asymptomatic group and ¥1,000 ($7) in the other two groups. Physician visit rates were highest in the severe complex group but remained low at 11.8%.
conclusionAn unsupervised machine learning approach identified three distinct LUTS clusters in adult women. Even in the most severely affected group, WTP was limited, and physician visit rates were low, highlighting significant unmet medical needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40760055What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.