ReviewInnere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany)2025
[The importance of sex/gender for graft and patient survival].
Review in Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Organ transplantation is the treatment of choice for patients with end-stage organ failure. Sex/gender differences in transplantation are extremely relevant, yet understudied. They are significant for every step in the transplantation process: from evaluation, listing, and acceptance onto the waiting list, to transition from the waiting list to transplantation, and finally to short- and long-term transplant survival. Ultimately, sex/gender differences also affect patient survival. Registry analyses often consider sex and gender only as a modifying factor, and women are underrepresented in clinical trials in transplantation medicine. The causes of these differences include not only biological factors (sex), but also psychosocial, socioeconomic, and cultural factors (gender). The current lack of consideration of sex/gender-specific differences leads to disadvantages. More targeted basic and clinical research must contribute to understanding the underlying mechanisms of these differences and applying them in diagnostic and therapeutic approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40760332What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.