ArticleArchives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique2025
Identifying clinically useful COVID-19 population and emergency department phenotypes across the pre-Omicron and Omicron periods.
Article in Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRapidly phenotyping patients can enhance healthcare management during new pandemic outbreaks. This can be accomplished through data-driven unsupervised methods that do not require clinical outcomes to be available. This study aimed to identify and compare phenotypes of COVID-19 patients and the subset of those patients who visited emergency departments using clustering techniques based on a limited set of easily accessible variables across different stages of the pandemic.
methodsWe conducted a population-based retrospective study that included all reported adult COVID-19 patients in the Basque Country from March 1, 2020, to January 9, 2022. Phenotypes were identified separately for the pre-Omicron and Omicron periods in an unsupervised manner using clustering techniques based on easily obtainable clinical and sociodemographic variables. The clinical characteristics of the phenotypes were compared, and subsequently their association with the clinical outcomes was assessed.
resultsFour phenotypes were identified in both the general population and the emergency department sub-group in the pre-Omicron period, whereas three phenotypes were extracted in Omicron. Within each scenario, these phenotypes varied significantly in age and comorbidity rates, leading to varying associations with COVID-19 outcomes. Despite their similarities, the emergency department phenotypes consistently experienced worse outcomes than their general population counterparts. Moreover, the population and emergency department phenotypes identified during the Omicron period resembled those from the pre-Omicron stage, suggesting stable phenotypic structures throughout the pandemic.
conclusionsThis study highlights the potential of phenotype identification based on a few accessible variables for a meaningful segregation of patients. This approach could be extended to future pandemics as a preventive public health strategy, especially considering the growing likelihood of facing new ones.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.