ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association2025
Occupational position and complexity in relation to Black-White cognitive disparities.
Article in Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multidimensional workplace stressors differentially impact cognitive trajectories.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Article
- Occupational position and complexity in relation to Black-White cognitive disparities.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionOccupational characteristics are less commonly measured social determinants of health that may contribute to racial dementia disparities. We assessed whether occupational position (OP) or complexity (OC) mediated racial cognitive disparities.
methodsParticipants were Black and White older adults from the Michigan Cognitive Aging Project (MCAP) (n = 536; M
resultsBlack participants had low (vs high) OP, which predicted worse episodic memory and global cognition (4% to 7% mediated). OC did not mediate cognitive disparities. Disparities in cognition operated through inequities in OP, education, and income. Effects were driven by participants not currently working. DISCUSSION: Occupation may influence cognitive disparities primarily through socioeconomic, rather than cognitive stimulation, pathways. Policies targeting workforce inequities may reduce racial disparities in dementia risk. HIGHLIGHTS: OP mediated 4% to 7% of racial cognitive disparities. OC did not uniquely mediate racial cognitive disparities. Sequential mediation highlighted life course socioeconomic pathways of disparities. Socioeconomic factors more strongly relate to cognitive disparities than engagement. Findings were driven by participants who were not currently in the workforce.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.