Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40760740›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2025

Vertical Topography in EEG Microstates: Physiology or Artifact Manifestation?

Tomáš Jordánek, Martin Lamoš, Radek Mareček

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tomáš JordánekFirst Department of Neurology, St. Anne's University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Martin LamošBrain and Mind Research Program, CEITEC, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Radek MarečekBrain and Mind Research Program, CEITEC, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.

Funding

Czech Health Research Council NU21-04-00254
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The analysis of EEG microstates offers a valuable approach for investigating large-scale brain networks and dynamics. Beyond the commonly reported "canonical microstates," prior literature has identified another distinct topography: the vertical topography (VT). This VT is characterized by a prominent straight line dividing positive and negative values, extending from the nasion to the inion. Notably, our own simultaneous EEG/fMRI and shielded cabin EEG data, collected from 77 participants, also revealed the presence of this topography. Based on our subsequent analyses of both human and phantom data, we conclude that VT partly represents artifacts arising from unspecified movements of the EEG cap and its metallic components. This conclusion is strongly supported by our evaluation of VT's spatiotemporal characteristics, derived from EEG recorded under diverse conditions. Specifically, we found a significant correlation between framewise displacement (obtained from human EEG/fMRI) and VT's temporal characteristics. Therefore, we advocate for a prudent interpretation of VT when it appears in data. Its mere existence as a resulting topography can impact the spatiotemporal parameters of other microstates and even distort the shapes of the other topographies.

Indexed as

ArtifactsBrainBrain MappingElectroencephalographyAdultFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePhantoms, ImagingYoung AdultartifactsEEGmicrostate analysismicrostatessimultaneous EEG/fMRI

Identifiers

PMID40760740
PMCPMC12321599

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.