ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association2025
Identifying dementia neuropathology using low-burden clinical data.
Article in Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Alzheimer Syndrome or Age-Related Dementia-History, Therapy and Prevention.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Identifying dementia neuropathology using low-burden clinical data.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionIdentifying dementia neuropathology is critical for guiding effective therapies and clinical trials. To tackle this, we developed semi-supervised models for identifying neuropathology using low-burden data to improve generalizability.
methodsWe defined low-burden data as being reasonably obtainable at a primary care setting. By using a semi-supervised learning paradigm, we can amplify the utility of low-burden data. We trained a clustering and a semi-supervised prediction model to yield clustering and prediction results for different neuropathology lesion types.
resultsOur clustering model identified two clinically meaningful outlier groups that were either neuropathology-enriched or -scarce. We predicted neuropathology burden across different pathology types and found that using low-burden data over multiple clinical visits can predict neuropathology on par with using higher-burden data. DISCUSSION: This work fills a critical gap in the field by using low-burden clinical data to predict neuropathology, thereby improving dementia screening, therapy, and targeted clinical trials. HIGHLIGHTS: Clinical data are useful for neuropathology screening in future clinical trials. Novel application of semi-supervised learning for identifying neuropathology. Clustering model found groups with highly different neuropathology prevalence. Low-burden data can provide relatively accurate predictions of pathology load. Higher-burden, longitudinal data are most helpful for predicting vascular lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.