Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40761348›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025

Association of food neophobia and food disgust with the willingness, benefits, and risks of insect food consumption among Chinese university students.

Hua Tian, Jie Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The Potential of Black Soldier Fly (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hua TianCollege of Life Science, Xinyang Normal University, Xinyang, China.
Jie ChenSchool of Marxism, Xinyang Normal University, Xinyang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Edible insects with high protein content are sufficient to meet the growing global demand for protein. However, some individuals have negative psychological reactions such as phobia and disgust toward insect foods; therefore, the large-scale promotion of insect foods has progressed slowly. This study investigated the impact of food neophobia and food disgust on the willingness, benefits, and risks of insect food consumption among Chinese university students. Methods: In 2023, 560 university students aged 18-25 years were recruited to fill an online questionnaire. The data were analyzed using a Mann-Whitney U test. Results: Most university students were unfamiliar and unwilling to consume insect foods, with higher levels of food neophobia and disgust indicating greater unwillingness to consume insect foods. Regardless of food neophobia and disgust levels, both groups agreed on the benefits of consuming insect foods and believed that consuming insect foods carried high risks. Conclusion: These findings underscored the significance of promoting and enhancing positive cognitions surrounding insect foods, and eliminating negative stereotypes about insect foods, especially those university students with high food neophobia or disgust. In addition, the findings provide reference for studying the psychological mechanism of insect food consumption and guiding young people to consume insect foods.

Indexed as

familiarityfood disgustfood neophobiainsect foodwillingness

Identifiers

PMID40761348
PMCPMC12319225

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.