ArticleDrug design, development and therapy2025
A Comparative Study of Sugammadex and Neostigmine: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Past 15 Years.
Article in Drug design, development and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sugammadex versus Neostigmine Reversal After Thoracoscopic Thymectomy in Myasthenia Gravis: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025Trial
- High-flow nasal oxygen with flexible channel oxygen insufflation for ankylosing spondylitis and cervical fracture-dislocation: a case report and literature review.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Review
- Evolving Trends and Core Contributors: A Bibliometric Update on Liposomal Bupivacaine.Pain research & management · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Sugammadex is a novel selective relaxant binding agent for aminosteroid neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs). However, existing literature reveals major knowledge gaps regarding its current applications and emerging research trends. Therefore, this study employed bibliometric analysis to map the evolutionary trajectory and research frontiers in sugammadex studies over the past 15 years. Methods: Publications on sugammadex (2009-2024) along with neostigmine studies (1993-2008) were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection. Data aggregation was performed using Microsoft Excel, while bibliometric visualizations were generated through the Bibliometrix package in R software. Additional network analyses were conducted using VOSviewer and CiteSpace. Results: The analysis encompassed 765 articles. Sugammadex-related research exhibited a notable upward trend, particularly from 2017 to 2021. The United States of America (USA) emerged as the most productive country in publication output (186 articles) and demonstrated superior quality (h-index: 16). Among institutions, Merck & Co. contributed the highest number of publications (74). Similar to neostigmine, key research areas for sugammadex have included: pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, adverse reactions, clinical applications, and specific patient populations. This focus is evidenced by substantial common references and keywords. Conclusion: Sugammadex surpasses neostigmine in rapidly, effectively, and safely reversing NMB induced by rocuronium/vecuronium across all depths. Its use expands to reversing residual NMB from NMBAs in various patient groups (hepatic/renal impairment, obese, neuromuscular disease, elderly, pediatric) and scenarios like difficult airways. Future research will focus on adverse reactions, effects in special populations, establishing quantitative NMB monitoring standards, and understanding NMBA antagonism failure mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.