ArticleFrontiers in bioinformatics2025
NeSyDPP-4: discovering DPP-4 inhibitors for diabetes treatment with a neuro-symbolic AI approach.
Article in Frontiers in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Neuro-symbolic artificial intelligence in medicine.Nature biomedical engineering · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Diabetes Mellitus (DM) constitutes a global epidemic and is one of the top ten leading causes of mortality (WHO, 2019), projected to rank seventh by 2030. The US National Diabetes Statistics Report (2021) states that 38.4 million Americans have diabetes. Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 (DPP-4) is an FDA-approved target for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, current DPP-4 inhibitors may cause adverse effects, including gastrointestinal issues, severe joint pain (FDA safety warning), nasopharyngitis, hypersensitivity, and nausea. Moreover, the development of novel drugs and the Methodology: Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship (QSAR) modeling is a widely used computational approach for evaluating the properties of chemical substances. In this study, we employed a Neuro-symbolic (NeSy) approach, specifically the Logic Tensor Network (LTN), to develop a DPP-4 QSAR model capable of identifying potential small-molecule inhibitors and predicting bioactivity classification. For comparison, we also implemented baseline models using Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) and Transformers. A total of 6,563 bioactivity records (SMILES-based compounds with IC Results: Among all tested configurations, the Neuro-symbolic QSAR model (NeSyDPP-4) performed best using a combination of CDK extended and Morgan fingerprints. The model achieved an accuracy of 0.9725, an F1-score of 0.9723, an ROC AUC of 0.9719, and a Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) of 0.9446. These results outperformed the baseline DNN and Transformer models, as well as existing state-of-the-art (SOTA) methods. To further validate the robustness of the model, we conducted an external evaluation using the Drug Target Common (DTC) dataset, where NeSyDPP-4 also demonstrated strong performance, with an accuracy of 0.9579, an AUC-ROC of 0.9565, a Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) of 0.9171, and an F1-score of 0.9577. Discussion: These findings suggest that the NeSyDPP-4 model not only delivered high predictive performance but also demonstrated generalizability to external datasets. This approach presents a cost-effective and reliable alternative to traditional vivo screening, offering valuable support for the identification and classification of biologically active DPP-4 inhibitors in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.