ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Effects of chronic low-frequency pulsed magnetic fields exposure on the contractility and morphology of biceps brachii in healthy adults-a randomized controlled, double-blind trial.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effects of calcium-regulating pulsed electromagnetic field combined with low-load blood flow restriction training on strength and performance adaptations in adolescent sprinters.Journal of exercise science and fitness · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Low-frequency pulse magnetic fields (PEMF) has been proven by classic transient receptor potential channel 1 (TRPC 1) transcription activation peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ coactivator-1α (PGC-1α) increase upstream of the mitochondria calcium - axis to increase muscle and mitochondria function, and recreates the consistent with exercise induced metabolic adaptations and power to ascend. Methods: Eighty healthy subjects with a mean age of 20 years were recruited and randomly divided into a PEMF group receiving magnetic field stimulation and a control group receiving sham treatment, with 40 patients in each group. The trial lasted for 4 weeks. Both groups were subjected to either a 15 min magnetic stimulation intervention or a sham treatment every 48 h. B-mode ultrasound images were used to evaluate changes in muscle thickness, cross-sectional area, pennation angle, and stiffness. Results: The PEMF group showed a significant increase in the MVC (maximum voluntary contraction) value and a significantly higher amplitude of the increase than the control group. There was no significant difference in BMI (Body Mass Index) between the two groups before and after the trial, nor in the rate of change in BMI between the two groups. However, from the analysis of the change trends, the PEMF group showed a downward trend, while the control group showed an increasing trend. In the PEMF group, all four parameters of muscle morphology were significantly higher than pre-test, while in the control group, all but one of the muscle stiffness metrics were significantly lower. The PEMF group had significantly higher muscle morphological parameters than did the control group. Conclusion: The current clinical trial showed that in healthy individuals aged 20 years, after 4 weeks of chronic exposure to a low-frequency pulsed magnetic field (1.5 mT, 3,300 Hz), the maximum voluntary contraction force of the biceps brachii muscle was significantly increased, and a contralateral effect was observed. At the same time, the muscle thickness, cross-sectional area, pennation, and stiffness of the intervention arm increased significantly. It provides a supportive basis for the improvement of muscle histopathology using this technique as an exercise replacement and a medical strategy for muscle improvement. Clinical trial registration: [https://www.chictr.org.cn], identifier: [ChiCTR2300078947].
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.