ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2025
Human Omental Mesothelial Cells Exhibit a Corneal Endothelial-Like Cell Phenotype for Tissue Engineering of a Corneal Endothelium Biomimetic.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate whether cultured human omental mesothelial cells (OMC) exhibit phenotypic and functional similarities to human corneal endothelial cells (CEC) and whether they can adhere to the corneal stroma and form a biomimetic corneal endothelium when grown on a human anterior lens capsule (HALC). Methods: Human OMC were isolated from the greater omentum. Human B4G12 CEC were used as a reference for native and functional CEC phenotype whereas human mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) served as a phenotypically distinct control group. OMC, CEC and MSC were compared using flow cytometry, immunofluorescence and qRT-PCR for lineage-specific markers, as well as through a transepithelial permeability assay. The adhesion capacity of OMC was also evaluated on both mouse corneal stroma and a decellularized HALC. Results: Several cell-surface markers commonly expressed at high levels in MSC (CD13, CD105, CD73 and CD44) were detected at markedly lower levels in OMC and CEC. OMC and CEC, but not MSC, also shared a similar expression profile of key structural markers (pan cytokeratin, ZO-1, β-catenin, N-cadherin, COL4A2, COL8A2) and functional corneal endothelium markers (AQP1, ATP1A1, SLC4A11, CLCN-3). In addition, OMC demonstrated transepithelial permeability values comparable to those of CEC monolayers supporting their barrier-forming capacity. Both CEC and OMC formed cobblestone-like monolayers on mouse corneal stroma and OMC seeded onto HALC generated a bioconstruct that reproduced the key morphological and ultra-structural features of native corneal endothelium. Conclusions: Overall, our findings show that cultured human OMC exhibit phenotypic and functional similarities to CEC. The ability of OMC to adhere to the corneal stroma and to generate a biomimetic corneal endothelium when combined with HALC highlights their potential use in corneal endothelial regeneration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.