Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40762974›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025

Digital Twins for Personalized Medicine Require Epidemiological Data and Mathematical Modeling: Viewpoint.

Alexandre Vallée

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Alexandre ValléeDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, Foch Hospital, Suresnes, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9158-4467

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digital twin (DT) technology is revolutionizing clinical practice by integrating diverse epidemiological data sources to create dynamic, patient-specific simulations. By leveraging data from genomics, proteomics, imaging, sociodemographics, and real-world behaviors, DTs provide a computational framework to model disease progression, optimize treatments, and personalize health care interventions. Through artificial intelligence (AI) and mathematical modeling, DTs facilitate predictive analytics for disease risk assessment, early diagnosis, and treatment response forecasting. This viewpoint explores the mathematical foundations of DTs, including differential equations for health trajectory modeling, Bayesian networks for multiomics integration, Markov models for disease progression, and reinforcement learning for treatment optimization. In addition, machine learning techniques such as recurrent neural networks and transformers enhance the predictive power of DTs by analyzing time-series clinical data and predicting future health events. The potential applications of DTs extend beyond individual patient care to public health surveillance, hospital resource management, and epidemiological modeling. However, several challenges persist, including data privacy concerns, computational infrastructure requirements, validation of predictive models, and regulatory compliance. Addressing these limitations requires interdisciplinary collaboration among health care providers, data scientists, and policy makers. With advancements in AI, wearable technology, and multiomics data integration, DTs are poised to reshape precision medicine. Future research should focus on refining computational efficiency, standardizing data interoperability, and ensuring ethical AI-driven decision-making. The continued evolution of DTs offers a transformative approach to proactive and personalized health care, reducing disease burden and enhancing patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalPrecision MedicineArtificial IntelligenceBayes TheoremHumansMachine LearningAIartificial intelligencebig dataclinical practicedigital twinepidemiologygraph neural networkshealth carehealth care simulationmachine learningmathematical modelingomics data integrationpersonalized medicinepredictive analyticspublic health surveillancerisk prediction

Identifiers

PMID40762974
PMCPMC12365566

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.