ArticlePloS one2025
Zebra optimization algorithm incorporating opposition-based learning and dynamic elite-pooling strategies and its applications.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sliding mode control gain optimization for a robot arm manipulator using an improved stochastic framework.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Dynamic multi-strategy Grey Wolf optimizer and its applications.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To address the limitations of the Zebra Optimization Algorithm (ZOA), including insufficient late-stage optimization search capability, susceptibility to local optima, slow convergence, and inadequate exploration, this paper proposes an enhanced Zebra Optimization Algorithm integrating opposition-based learning and a dynamic elite-pooling strategy (OP-ZOA: Opposition-Based Learning Dynamic Elite-Pooling Zebra Optimization Algorithm). he proposed search algorithm employs a good point set-elite opposition-based learning mechanism to initialize the population, enhancing diversity and facilitating escape from local optima. Additionally, a real-time information synchronization mechanism is incorporated into the position update process, enabling the exchange of position and state information between the optimal individual (Xbest) and the vigilante agent (Xworse). This eliminates information silos, thereby improving global search capability and convergence speed. Furthermore, a dynamic elite-pooling strategy is introduced, incorporating three distinct fitness factors. The optimal individual's position is updated by randomly selecting from these factors, enhancing the algorithm's ability to attain the global optimum and increasing its overall robustness. During experimental evaluation, the efficiency of OP-ZOA was verified using the CEC2017 test functions, demonstrating superior performance compared to seven recently proposed meta-heuristic algorithms (Bloodsucking Leech Algorithm (BSLO), Parrot Optimization Algorithm (PO), Polar Lights Algorithm (PLO), Red-tailed Hawk Optimization Algorithm (RTH), Bitterling Fish Optimization Algorithm (BFO), Spider Wasp Optimization Algorithm (SWO) and Zebra Optimization Algorithm (ZOA)). Finally, OP-ZOA exhibits distinct advantages in optimizing the APF (artificial potential field) method to address local optimum convergence issues. Specifically, it achieves faster iteration speeds across four different environments, with the planned path length after escaping local optima being shortened by an average of 7.55175 m (16.291%) compared to other optimization algorithms. These results confirm OP-ZOA's enhanced optimization capability, significantly improving both escape efficiency from local optima and solution reliability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.