ReviewJCO oncology practice2026
Management of Anemia in Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes/Neoplasms With Novel Agents.
Review in JCO oncology practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Understanding the evolving role of early palliative care in myelodysplastic syndromes: a 2026 narrative review.Annals of hematology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a heterogeneous group of diseases that are prognostically stratified into lower-risk (LR-MDS) and higher-risk MDS on the basis of the International Prognostic Scoring System (eg, IPSS, revised IPSS, and molecular IPSS). Anemia is a hallmark of MDS and can lead to worsening of preexisting comorbidities, long-term RBC transfusion dependence, and profound fatigue. Although RBC transfusion support provides rapid relief of anemia-associated symptoms, it also carries a risk of iron overload and alloimmunization, and is associated with a decreased quality of life. Thus, many clinical trials and treatment strategies for LR-MDS focus on RBC transfusion independence (RBC-TI) as a primary end point. In this review, we discuss the updated treatment paradigm for anemia in LR-MDS. Novel insights in the pathogenesis of MDS and results from positive phase III clinical trials in LR-MDS have led to a growing number of therapeutic options (eg, luspatercept and imetelstat). Imetelstat was recently added as a new agent for patients who are refractory/resistant or ineligible for erythropoiesis-stimulating agent treatment on the basis of the randomized phase III IMerge trial, showing that imetelstat led to the primary end point of RBC-TI for ≥8 weeks in 40% of patients compared with 15% in patients receiving placebo. However, future clinical trials are needed to investigate the optimal sequencing of different agents and the potential of improving efficacy using combination of therapeutic strategies in LR-MDS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.