Evidence mapPaperPMID 40764207Full record

ArticleThe journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease2026

Dietary index for gut microbiota (DI-GM) and cognitive function: NHANES findings and validation in a Hong Kong cohort with metagenomic data.

Hui Jiang, Jiashuo Zhang, Shuyi Li, Timothy Kwok, Siew C Ng, Allen Ting Chun Lee, Zhilu Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hui JiangMicrobiota I-Center (MagIC), Hong Kong SAR, China; Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Jiashuo ZhangQingdao medical college, Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Shuyi LiDepartment of Medicine and Therapeutics, Jockey Club Centre for Osteoporosis Care and Control, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Timothy KwokDepartment of Medicine and Therapeutics, Jockey Club Centre for Osteoporosis Care and Control, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Siew C NgMicrobiota I-Center (MagIC), Hong Kong SAR, China; Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, State Key Laboratory of Digestive Diseases, Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Allen Ting Chun LeeDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China. Electronic address: allenlee@cuhk.edu.hk.
Zhilu XuMicrobiota I-Center (MagIC), Hong Kong SAR, China; Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, State Key Laboratory of Digestive Diseases, Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China. Electronic address: zhiluxu@cuhk.edu.hk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe diet-gut-microbiota-brain axis is critical for maintaining brain health. The Dietary Index for Gut Microbiota (DI-GM), comprising beneficial and unfavorable components, may serve as a proxy for this connection, yet its association with cognition remains underexplored.

methodsThis study examined the relationship between DI-GM, its components, and cognitive function in older adults using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Findings were validated in an independent Hong Kong osteoporosis cohort (OS cohort) with gut metagenomic data to assess of microbiota's mediating role in diet-cognition relationship. Cognitive assessment in NHANES utilized the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD), Animal Fluency Test (AFT), and Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), while the OS cohort employed the Hong Kong version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (HK-MoCA). DI-GM was calculated from 24-hour dietary recalls. The diet-cognition associations were assessed by weighted multivariate regressions, supplemented by restricted cubic spline (RCS), subgroup, correlation network, and mediation analyses.

resultsHigher DI-GM was significantly associated with better performance on DSST (OR=0.90; 95 % CI: 0.82, 0.99; p = 0.033). The beneficial-to-gut-microbiota score (BGMS) associated with lower psychometric mild cognitive impairment (p-MCI) risk (OR=0.88; 95 % CI: 0.80, 0.98; p = 0.022) and better CERAD immediate and delayed recall and DSST (all p < 0.05). The beneficial-to-gut-microbiota components like dietary fiber demonstrated protective effects across cognitive domains, while refined grains was associated with poorer cognition. In the OS cohort, higher dietary fiber intake correlated with higher HK-MoCA score (p < 0.05) and increased abundance of fermenting bacteria. Among these species, Eubacterium ventriosum mediated the beneficial effect of dietary fiber intake on dementia risk reduction, with an indirect effect of -0.014 (95 % CrI: -0.040, -0.001), accounting for approximately 12.7 % of the total effect.

conclusionHigher adherence to beneficial-to-gut-microbiota dietary patterns, as reflected by DI-GM, was associated with better cognitive function in older adults. These findings highlight the importance of a gut-microbiota-targeted diet in maintaining cognitive health.

Indexed as

CognitionCognitive DysfunctionDietGastrointestinal MicrobiomeAgedCohort StudiesFemaleHong KongHumansMaleMetagenomicsMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsNutrition SurveysCognitive functionDI-GMFiberMetagenomicNHANESOlder adults

Identifiers

PMID40764207
PMCPMC12811749

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.