Evidence mapPaperPMID 40764338Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2025

Effect of a single ultra processed meal on myocardial endothelial function, adenosine mediated effects and cognitive performances.

Yousif A Lucinian, Christine Gagnon, Élise Latour, Virginie Hamel, Josep Iglesies-Grau, Anil Nigam, Francois Harel, Anna Nozza, Martin Juneau, Jean-Claude Moubarac and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06353009 (Effect of a Single Ultra-Processed Meal on Myocardial Endothelial Function Assessed With Positron Emission Tomography), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06353009 nacompletednot on this map

Effect of a Single Ultra-Processed Meal on Myocardial Endothelial Function Assessed With Positron Emission Tomography

TypeinterventionalSponsorMatthieu Pelletier-Galarneau, MD MScRan2020 to 2023Enrolled15ConditionsMyocardial Endothelial FunctionArmsNOVA4 meal, NOVA1-3 meal
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Yousif A LucinianDepartment of Medical Imaging, Montreal Heart Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Christine GagnonResearch Center and Centre ÉPIC, Montreal Heart Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Élise LatourResearch Center and Centre ÉPIC, Montreal Heart Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Virginie HamelNutrition Department, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Josep Iglesies-GrauResearch Center and Centre ÉPIC, Montreal Heart Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Anil NigamResearch Center and Centre ÉPIC, Montreal Heart Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Francois HarelDepartment of Medical Imaging, Montreal Heart Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Anna NozzaMontreal Health Innovations Coordinating Center, Montreal Heart Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Martin JuneauResearch Center and Centre ÉPIC, Montreal Heart Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Jean-Claude MoubaracNutrition Department, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Louis BhererResearch Center and Centre ÉPIC, Montreal Heart Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Matthieu Pelletier-GalarneauDepartment of Medical Imaging, Montreal Heart Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada. Matthieu.pelletier-galarneau@icm-mhi.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Consumption of ultra-processed foods has been linked to various adverse health effects; however, the mechanisms underlying these effects remain poorly understood. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a single ultra-processed meal on myocardial blood flow (MBF), measured using positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT), and its effects on cognitive performance. Fourteen healthy adult males were enrolled in a randomized crossover trial, receiving either a non-ultra-processed meal (comprising foods from NOVA groups 1 to 3) or an ultra-processed meal (comprising foods from NOVA groups 1 to 4) before crossing over to the alternate meal. After each meal, rubidium-chloride PET/CT scans were conducted at baseline and during intermediate (80 µg/kg/min) and high-dose adenosine (140 µg/kg/min). Neuropsychological testing followed each meal. MBF and MFR at intermediate-dose adenosine was significantly higher after the ultra-processed meal compared to the non-ultra-processed meal (1.62 vs. 1.22 mL/min/g, p = 0.015, and 2.43 vs. 1.88, p = 0.012, respectively), with a mean relative difference of 40.7%. No significant differences were observed between the meals at baseline or high-dose adenosine for both MBF and MFR. When considering carry-over and learning effects, overall performance on neuropsychological testing was worse following the ultra-processed meal during the first period. In healthy adult males, a single ultra-processed meal enhanced adenosine-mediated MBF and MFR at intermediate-dose adenosine and was associated with potentially reduced cognitive performance compared to a non-ultra-processed meal.Trial registration number: NCT06353009 (ClinicalTrials.gov ID). Trial registration Date: 08/04/2024 https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06353009 .

Indexed as

AdenosineCognitionEndothelium, VascularMealsAdultCoronary CirculationCross-Over StudiesHumansMalePositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyYoung AdultAdenosineAdenosineEndothelial functionMyocardial blood flowPositron emission tomographyRubidiumUltra-processed food

Identifiers

PMID40764338
PMCPMC12325996

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.