ArticleScientific reports2025
Development of a hip osteoarthritis index for gait quality assessment: a data-driven comparative study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Scientific evidence demonstrates a strong relation between gait abnormalities and osteoarthritis, highlighting the need for a gait quality index for rapid osteoarthritis monitoring. Using a dataset on hip osteoarthritis, including 80 healthy individuals and 106 patients classified by Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grading scale with pre- and post-arthroplasty surgery data, we introduced a linear model and a Hip Osteoarthritis Index (HOI) based on two kinematic features: (1) hip-knee angular velocity area and (2) hip maximum angular velocity. Additionally, we employed multi-layer perceptron (MLP) and deep recurrent neural network (RNN) models to evaluate the efficacy of our linear model. For healthy-patient, affected-unaffected leg, and severity grades classifications the accuracy of all models ranged around [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], and [Formula: see text], respectively, with no significant differences ([Formula: see text]). HOI is highly correlated with KL grades ([Formula: see text]) and affected-unaffected leg of patients ([Formula: see text]). HOI differences ([Formula: see text]) were significant for (1) healthy and patients (pre-/post-surgery and affected/unaffected legs), (2) pre- and post-surgery of affected legs across severity grades, and (3) affected and unaffected legs, pre-surgery. Post-surgery, the gait pattern became more symmetric, with no significant HOI difference between affected and unaffected legs ([Formula: see text]). The affected legs' HOI moves toward healthy individuals ([Formula: see text]), indicating a more natural gait. The comparable results of the models, along with significant HOI differences between healthy and patients, pre- and post-surgery, and affected and unaffected legs, as well as the high correlation of HOI with KL grades, suggest HOI as an ideal candidate for hip osteoarthritis assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.