ArticleNature communications2025
Machine learning models highlight environmental and genetic factors associated with the Arabidopsis circadian clock.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mul-PheG2P: decoupled learning and prediction-space fusion enables robust and interpretable multi-phenotype genomic prediction.The New phytologist · 2026Article
- SPIRAL: A versatile online single time-point circadian analysis platform for rice.Science advances · 2026Article
- The circadian architecture of tumor immunity: mechanistic insights and treatment strategies.Biomarker research · 2026Review
- Time- and space-resolved transcriptional regulation in Arabidopsis thaliana.Plant biology (Stuttgart, Germany) · 2026Article
- Printing technologies for monitoring crop health.Nature communications · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The circadian clock of plants contributes to their survival and fitness. However, understanding clock function at the transcriptome level and its response to the environment requires assaying across high resolution time-course experiments. Generating these datasets is labour-intensive, costly and, in most cases, performed under tightly controlled laboratory conditions. To overcome these barriers, we have developed ChronoGauge: an ensemble model that can reliably estimate the endogenous circadian time of Arabidopsis plants using the expression of a handful of time-indicating genes within a single time-pointed transcriptomic sample. ChronoGauge can predict a plant's circadian time with high accuracy across unseen Arabidopsis bulk RNA-seq and microarray samples, and can be further applied to make non-random predictions across samples in non-model species, including field samples. Finally, we demonstrate how ChronoGauge can be applied to generate hypotheses regarding the response of the circadian transcriptome to specific genotypes or environmental conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.