ReviewJournal of cardiothoracic surgery2025
Macrophage bibliometric study and visualization in myocardial ischemia-reperfusion.
Review in Journal of cardiothoracic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeRestoration of blood flow after tissue ischemia aggravates the injury, a phenomenon known as ischemia-reperfusion injury. And ischemia-reperfusion injury of myocardium becomes a common cause of death after surgery in many patients. Relevant studies have proved that ischemia-reperfusion of myocardium has a strong correlation with autophagy, macrophage, endoplasmic reticulum, etc. Therefore, this paper systematically summarises and discusses the macrophage research in myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury through visual research and metrological analysis, hoping to point out the direction for the researcher in this field.
methodsWe conducted a comprehensive search of publications on myocardial IRI and macrophages in the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) database, covering the period from 2008 to June 2024. Bibliometric tools (CiteSpace, VOSviewer, and Excel) were used to analyze various factors such as publication trends, countries, institutions, journals, authors, and keywords. Visual maps were created to identify current research hotspots and forecast future developments in the field.
resultsFor this study we included a total of 1039 relevant studies, with a dynamic upward trend in the number of publications. China and the United States are in the top two in terms of the number of publications. The institution with the most publications is Fudan University, and the one with the most collaborations is the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences. We also obtained the most publications with the highest number of citations and the highest impact factor. Inflammatory processes, mitochondrial autophagy, endoplasmic reticulum stress, and macrophages are current hotspots. Exploring molecular proteins and effective strategies to inhibit myocardial I/R injury may become the focus of future research.
conclusionMacrophages have emerged as a key area of focus in myocardial IRI research in recent years. This is the first bibliometric study to comprehensively analyze the research landscape on macrophages and myocardial IRI, providing valuable insights for researchers and guiding future developments in the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.