ArticleSchizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany)2025
Increased intra-subject variability in reward behavior relates to symptom severity in schizophrenia.
Article in Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Schizophrenia (SZ) is a complex disorder characterized by positive and negative symptoms that have been linked to dysfunction in cognition and reward motivation. Recent findings show higher inter-subject variability in SZ in various cognitive functions. This raises the question of whether there is also higher intra-subject variability in SZ at the psychological level, specifically increased variability across the trials of a psychological task within the subject itself, that is, intra-subject variability. To examine fluctuations in behavior during a reward-based discrimination and liking task, we analyzed intra-subject variability in SZ and observed the following: (i) increased intra-subjective variability across all four behavioral measures, that is, response times (RT) for discrimination and liking tasks, as well as accuracy (ACC) and liking ratings; (ii) significant correlation of the different measures' intra-subject variabilities across the distinct tasks, e.g., RT, ACC, and liking ratings among each other; and (iii) relation of the increased intra-subjective variability in the behavioral measures (RT, ACC, liking) with overall and general psychopathological symptom severity, as measured by the positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS). Together, we demonstrate abnormally increased intra-subjective variability in a reward-motivation task in SZ and its key role in relation to symptom severity. This increased intra-subject variability at the psychological-behavioral level suggests abnormal and imprecise timing in cognitive processing, which aligns with analogous findings of temporal imprecision at the neural level.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.