Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40764650›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

YOLO-LeafNet: a robust deep learning framework for multispecies plant disease detection with data augmentation.

Ramanjot Kaur, Usha Mittal, Ankita Wadhawan, Ahmad Almogren, Jimmy Singla, Salil Bharany, Seada Hussen, Ateeq Ur Rehman, Asma A Al-Huqail

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ramanjot KaurSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, Punjab, India.
Usha MittalSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, Punjab, India.
Ankita WadhawanSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, Punjab, India.
Ahmad AlmogrenDepartment of Computer Science, College of Computer and Information Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, 11633, Saudi Arabia.
Jimmy SinglaSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, Punjab, India.
Salil BharanyChitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, Rajpura, India.
Seada HussenDepartment of Electrical Power, Adama Science and Technology University, Adama, 1888, Ethiopia. seada.hussen@aastu.edu.et.
Ateeq Ur RehmanSchool of Computing, Gachon University, Seongnam-si, 13120, Republic of Korea.
Asma A Al-HuqailChair of Climate Change, Environmental Development and Vegetation Cover, Department of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, 11451, Saudi Arabia. aalhuqail@ksu.edu.sa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant diseases significantly harm crops, resulting in significant economic losses across the globe. In order to reduce the harm that these diseases produce, plant diseases must be diagnosed accurately and timely manner. In this work, a YOLO-LeafNet approach is proposed for detecting diseases from leaf images of four distinct species, namely, grape, bell pepper, corn, and potato. About 8850 leaf images have been acquired for this work from five different publicly available datasets on Kaggle. All the acquired images were pre-processed by applying four different image pre-processing operations. The number of images in the training dataset was tripled for better model performance by applying five different augmentation operations. The augmented dataset was then used to train YoloV5, YoloV8, and the proposed YOLO-LeafNet. The performance of all three models is evaluated in terms of recall, precision, and Mean Average Precision (mAP). The YoloV5 attained a precision of 0.861, recall of 0.868, mAP50 of 0.944, and 0.815 of mAP50-95, and YoloV8 attained 0.977 precision, 0.975 recall, 0.984 of mAP50, and mAP50-95 of 0.915, whereas the proposed the YOLO-LeafNet attained precision of 0.985, recall of 0.980, mAP50 of 0.990, and mAP50-95 of 0.940. The experimental results reveal that the proposed YOLO-LeafNet outperformed YOLOv5 and YOLOv8 in terms of all performance metrics.

Indexed as

Deep LearningImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPlant DiseasesPlant LeavesAlgorithmsCapsicumVitisZea mays

Identifiers

PMID40764650
PMCPMC12325615

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.